Washington Bridge League Solver's Club - Jan/Feb 2012
Moderator: Steve RobinsonNov/Dec 2012Mar/Apr 2012
Congratulations to Brad Theurer who came in first with a score of 490.
Congratulations to Brad Theurer who came in first with a score of 490. He wins a free entry to the Unit Game, and will be invited to be on a future panel. Tied for second were Nikola Tcholakov, Robert Stone and Mark Rosen with a score of 470. Tied for fifth were Prahalad Rajkumar, Chuck Sadowski, Pete Hughes, Dave Capera, Mike Lawrence, Leon Letwin, Craig Hemhill and Donna Rogall with a score of 460. Tied for thirteenth were Nigel Guthrie, Jon Farber, Allen Veasey, Lloyd Rawley, Sylvia Shi, Zbych Bednarek, Mark Chen, Craig Olson, Steve Chaplin, Kenton Schoen and Carl Jeschke with a score of 450. Tied for twenty-fourth were Richard Wimberley, Mike Deverin, Karen Heath, Al Duncker, Lyle Poe, Tom Musso, Paul Benedict, Randall Holden, Sven Pride, Fred Gramlich, Robert Cohen and Sven Pride with a score of 440. The average score of the 184 solvers was 379. The average score of the experts was 451.

All readers are encouraged to send answers and/or new problems to Steve Robinson, 2891 S. Abingdon St. #A2 Arlington, VA, 22206-1329. In addition to the winner receiving a free play at the WBL Unit Game, Steve will play with anyone who gets a perfect score or who exactly matches all five of his answers. If you send a self-addressed stamped envelope to the above address along with your answers, I will send you a copy of the new problems to ensure that you can meet his next deadline. You can pick up a copy of the problems at the WBL Unit Game in Maryland, and can send answers or requests for problems to robinswr@erols.com. You can also see and answer the problems at the WBL web site. WBL Solvers Club uses Washington Standard as published July 1996. I accept only the first answer from each solver unless it is clear that the solver wants to correct his answer.

I personally score all the problems. If a majority of the solvers vote for an answer, and the answer is reasonable I will give that answer 100 points. I will not give 100 points to an answer that I consider bad no matter how many experts vote for it. There are times when I want to make a point. I will give that answer 100 points and will therefore give the majority answer 90 points. For the other answers I consider how good the answer is and how many experts vote for it for its score. If you submitted an answer that got 20 points, that bid would get a bad score at the table. A good exercise would be to figure out why I gave your answer 20 points. You might have misread the problem.

The book Washington Standard second edition is out. If you are a serious bridge player, this book is a must. You can purchase a copy from Steve for $25.00 whenever you see him or can send him a check for $30.15 that includes $5.15 for priority mail.